21bc Gears of War for Windows PC Game Review | YouGamers
     Home
Downloads     
Articles Previews Forum YouGamers Twitter
YouGamers.com Reviews Gears of War for Windows
 
By: Aaron Barnes Nov 10, 2007

PCs Can Be Finicky Beasts

Visuals scale well across a range of hardware, with the help of some graphics options tweaking

Of course, this is a PC game, so the overall performance and quality assessment isn't that simple. Gears of War ships with support for both Windows XP and Windows Vista, wit 216a h an option to turn on DirectX 10 rendering when running under Vista. First, what improvements or enhancements are made possible with by the DirectX 10 rendering path? Well, none, at least as far as my eyes can tell. A scene rendered using the DirectX 9 API under Window XP has no apparent differences from the same scene rendered using either DX9 Ex or DX 10 under Windows Vista. The only immediate enhancement available using DX 10 is antialiasing, and it comes at a steep cost in performance. Furthermore, under Vista, the DirectX 10 rendering path is actually slower than the DirectX 9 Ex one.

The best performance, with no apparent degradation in visual quality, comes under good ol' Windows XP, which had higher minimum and average frame rate numbers on the test systems. And while antialiasing improves the graphical experience in a noticeable way, it put the hurt on a 3.5GHz Intel Core 2 Quad system with 2GB of RAM an overclocked NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX. Even if you followed my lead and sold an organ to purchase such over-the-top hardware, turning on antialiasing will cause hitching and sudden frame rate drops. After all of my benchmark testing, I concluded that Windows XP was the way to go with Gears of War (for the curious, NVIDIA's ForceWare beta 169.04 drivers were used for these tests).

Performance is best on Windows XP, and drops measurably on Windows Vista, particularly when with Antialiasing on

At 1920x1200, the framerate difference is magnified. With no visual difference between DX9 and DX10 rendering, Windows XP is the clear winner

No graphics engine is without its quirks, and Gears of War has a couple. First, the in-game vertical synchronization option didn't work. Under both Windows XP and Vista (with DirectX10 on and off), the only way to achieve synchronization with the monitor's refresh rate is to force it through the graphics card drivers. Normally, vertical sync isn't much of an issue, but with Gears of War the tearing was pronounced when the frame rate strayed too far from my monitor's 60Hz refresh rate.

Second, the game engine seems to be linked to a 60 fps cap, of some kind; no matter how low I cranked the graphics settings and resolution on a fast PC, the frame rate never rose above 63 FPS, and the FRAPS counter spent most of its time at a steady 60 FPS. The game exhibited this behavior across operating systems and with both DirectX9 and DirectX 10 rendering paths, so I can only assume that the graphics engine is tied to an update cycle of 60Hz. Note that this internal frame rate is increased from the Xbox 360 version of the game, which ran at 30 FPS (though the console version's physics and game code worked in 60Hz intervals).

Ready For Another Heaping Helping

This was my fourth time through Gears of War, and yet I enjoyed every minute of it. Even with additional content, the PC release is the same linear romp through an action-movie script, complete with obvious and convoluted plot devices and hokey dialogue. So what makes the game so inherently enjoyable and worthy of such high praise? First, it's accessible: anyone can pick up and play in a matter of minutes, and even shooter neophytes won't feel like stooges on Casual difficulty. Second, and most important, are the high production values. From audio to character models to cut scenes to gameplay, the entire game feels like one coherent piece of entertainment. It delivers on the suspension of disbelief and sucks you in to the story from start to finish, and you walk away wanting more of the experience. Gears of War isn't trying to raise social questions like Bioshock or wow us with innovate gameplay like Portal. It is, however, a highly polished shooter that delivers in the area that matters most to gamers: it's just plain fun.

Epic have have really hit the mark with Gears of War for the PC. Next, indeed - sequel, anyone?

... so let's give them a hand for a job well done


Summary of YouGamers Hardware Testing

The publisher of this game state the following specifications for their minimum and recommended requirements:

Component Publisher's Minimum Publisher's Recommended
Processor 2.4 GHz Intel; 2.0 GHz AMD Not specified
Memory 1 GB
Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 6600+; ATI X700+
Graphics Card Example Not specified
Free Disk Space 12 GB free space
Net Link Broadband
 

To learn more about how YouGamers performs its hardware testing, click here. Through our extensive gameplay and hardware testing across the full spectrum of PC configurations, YouGamers suggests that one should use the following guidelines for an appropriate minimum and recommended setup:

Component YouGamers Minimum YouGamers Recommended
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3400+ / Intel Pentium 4 540 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ / Intel Core 2 Duo E6450
Memory 1 GB 2 GB
Graphics Card ATI Radeon X1650 256MB / NVIDIA GeForce 7600 256MB ATI Radeon HD 2900 Pro 512MB / NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
Free Disk Space 12 GB 12 GB
Net Link Broadband Broadband
 

Scores

To learn more about our scoring methodology, please click here.

Gameplay 90 Right up there with the best games you've ever played. To play Gears of War is to enjoy it. With high production values throughout, the experience rarely disappoints. The transition to the PC hasn't been kind to some of the controls, but playing with a mouse and keyboard is a blast. Several multiplayer modes, including co-op, give replay value.
Graphics 96 A great-looking game, with a cohesive art style and excellent texture and shader work. Character models and animations are superb, as are the lighting effects. Cartoonish blood splatter is out-of-place, but overall the graphics in Gears of War are on par with the best the PC has to offer.
Audio 93 The description may be overused, but the voice acting is Hollywood-quality. Sound effects are of the same caliber, and the music draws you in. In terms of enhancing the atmosphere, the audio does its job perfectly. The only omission is EAX support.
Technology 89 Unreal Engine 3 is looking like the technology to beat these days. Considering the excellent visuals, the game runs well on a wide variety of hardware, but it still takes an über-system to drive high resolutions. The Games for Windows Live system does its best to break the online experience, but multiplayer is lag-free and enjoyable nonetheless.
OVERALL
95
If you missed the phenomenon on the Xbox 360 last year (or even if you didn't), you owe it to yourself to give Gears of War a run-through on the PC. It's the same great-looking, fast-paced, fun-to-play game, only with an extended story and higher-resolution visuals. That the experience is better on a PC is only natural, given that mouse-and-keyboard controls are the heart of any honest shooter. What are you waiting for, Epic? Give us Gears of War 2. Now.


If you wish to comment on this review or talk about the game further, then click right here (registration not required).




 

Related Stuff

 Articles: E3 2008 - Summary   Jul 18, 2008
  20fd News: Microsoft Releases a Multi-GPU Hotfix for Vista   Dec 05, 2007
 Reviews: Unreal Tournament 3   Dec 04, 2007
 Reviews: Flight Simulator X: Acceleration   Nov 23, 2007
 News: Mass Effect Ships   Nov 21, 2007
 News: European date for UT3 set in stone   Nov 16, 2007
 Articles: Halo 3 (Xbox 360)   Oct 19, 2007
 Previews: Unreal Tournament 3   Oct 17, 2007
 Reviews: Halo 2 for Windows Vista   Jun 18, 2007
 Reviews: Flight Simulator X   Mar 06, 2007

Tags



See if your PC can handle the latest games:






  About Us     Privacy and Legal     Game-o-Meter FAQ     Contact Us     Advertise With Us     Jobs     Futuremark  






0